Thanks for the feedback. You are correct in that I don't go exactly with the summitpost format. A year ago I came up with my own format and it seems to have worked well. You are the only one to have judged my pages based on format, and not useful information. If you take a look around you might find many other pages that are similiar in format. I prefer my style because it leaves the reader the option of leavng the text at any time. It seems silly to have to go from link to link to get important info on reletively nontechnical mountains. I often feel that the appeal of a mountain resides in the overall depiction, not just an "overview" or a "route," so I just drop it all in the overview.
One more thing, I would appreciate it if, going forward, you could vote my pages based on useful info and not fromat. I've put in too much time and effort on my pages to watch them fall into the "adopt" catagory because of format votes. I will take in consideration your opinion on format next time I post a page. By the way, welcome to summitpost, I noticed you signed up today. Hopefully you can add a mountain or two.
Nice Apache page... I think you will like the rockfall sequence I added... although it was after I posted the sequence that I noticed that you had already submitted a couple of the photos individualy... hope this isn't overkill. I also added a few shots of the Queens Way. Apache was an interesting mountain for me... I will try and add route info on the Queens Way sometime soon.
Kane - Sep 18, 2002 10:24 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentThanks for the feedback. You are correct in that I don't go exactly with the summitpost format. A year ago I came up with my own format and it seems to have worked well. You are the only one to have judged my pages based on format, and not useful information. If you take a look around you might find many other pages that are similiar in format. I prefer my style because it leaves the reader the option of leavng the text at any time. It seems silly to have to go from link to link to get important info on reletively nontechnical mountains. I often feel that the appeal of a mountain resides in the overall depiction, not just an "overview" or a "route," so I just drop it all in the overview.
Kane - Sep 18, 2002 10:43 pm - Hasn't voted
Untitled CommentOne more thing, I would appreciate it if, going forward, you could vote my pages based on useful info and not fromat. I've put in too much time and effort on my pages to watch them fall into the "adopt" catagory because of format votes. I will take in consideration your opinion on format next time I post a page. By the way, welcome to summitpost, I noticed you signed up today. Hopefully you can add a mountain or two.
Popoff - Jan 6, 2003 7:18 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGood page. Nice information.
JonBradford - Nov 26, 2003 9:59 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentKane,
Nice Apache page... I think you will like the rockfall sequence I added... although it was after I posted the sequence that I noticed that you had already submitted a couple of the photos individualy... hope this isn't overkill. I also added a few shots of the Queens Way. Apache was an interesting mountain for me... I will try and add route info on the Queens Way sometime soon.
Jon Bradford
Alan Ellis - Feb 15, 2004 9:08 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentGimme that pano software. It's great!
Brad Snider - Oct 5, 2004 2:05 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentExcellent work, as always!
miztflip - Nov 22, 2004 10:58 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentNice work.
Antonio Giani - Aug 15, 2005 3:18 am - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentOttima pagina!
Ciao Antonio
James C - Jan 27, 2006 11:56 pm - Voted 10/10
Untitled CommentThe Apache Couloir looks fun